Add Row
Add Element
Glytain Logo
update
Glytain.com
update
Add Element
  • Home
  • Categories
    • Healthcare
    • Innovation
    • Digital
    • Marketing
    • Analysis
    • Insights
    • Trends
    • Empowerment
    • Providers
    • Tech News
    • Extra News
March 01.2025
2 Minutes Read

Global Survey Reveals Society's Attitudes Toward Breakthrough Technologies

Bayer logo in colorful design representing society's attitudes toward breakthrough technologies.

Survey Unveils Global Public Attitudes Towards Breakthrough Technologies

As leaders convene for the World Economic Forum Annual Meeting 2025 in Davos, significant insights emerge from one of the largest global surveys examining public sentiment towards transformative technologies. Conducted by Ipsos in collaboration with Leaps by Bayer and Boston Consulting Group (BCG), the study engaged over 13,000 respondents across 13 countries, highlighting diverse hopes, fears, and concerns regarding advancements in health and nutrition.

Optimism Varies: Hope for Science Across Borders

While a striking 72% of respondents expressed optimism towards science and technology, regional disparities surfaced. Notably, middle-income countries like China (86%) and Nigeria (94%) exhibited a stronger belief in scientific progress than high-income nations such as France (53%) and the U.S. (68%). This phenomenon invites further exploration of why certain cultures nurture greater trust in science, especially in the context of historical skepticism.

Trust Crisis: A Challenge in the West

Despite the buoyancy surrounding scientific advancements, trust in health authorities remains a critical concern, especially in Western nations. With only 62% of global respondents trusting their health institutions, this figure dips alarmingly in countries like France and the U.S. This lack of trust can hinder the acceptance of new technologies, complicating efforts aimed at overcoming vaccine hesitancy and adapting to medical innovations. Mistrust, often exacerbated by the polarizing nature of political discourse, reveals a critical barrier innovators must navigate.

Mixed Feelings on AI: A Paradox in High-Tech Countries

Intriguingly, despite being at the forefront of artificial intelligence developments, the U.S. shows considerable hesitance towards AI in medical treatment, with only 50% of respondents favoring its use. This skepticism underscores the necessity for transparency and robust dialogue about AI's role in healthcare, potentially shaping strategies for both patient trust and wider adoption.

Support for New Genomic Techniques and Cell Therapies

In contrast to AI, enthusiasm for cell and gene therapies emerged prominently, with 59% of global respondents supporting the development of expensive cures, despite accessibility issues. Additionally, new genomic techniques (NGTs) in agriculture attracted positive attention from 56% of participants, particularly in terms of enhancing climate resilience for crops. This indicates an openness to advancements in biotechnology that can alleviate societal challenges.

Knowledge is Key: Closing the Gap

One recurring theme from the study is the correlation between knowledge and trust. The more informed respondents are about specific technologies, the more positively they view them. Thus, for innovators, there is a significant opportunity to foster understanding through educational outreach and effective communication strategies. Listening to the public’s concerns and addressing uncertainties directly can help transform skepticism into trust.

As Dr. Juergen Eckhardt from Bayer aptly put it, "Building societal acceptance begins with actively listening to people's hopes and concerns about breakthrough science.” The findings underscore a potent lesson for the industry: to innovate successfully, building a collaborative dialogue between science and society is essential.

Tech News

Write A Comment

*
*
Related Posts All Posts

Why Understanding AI Benchmarks and Spain's Blackout Matters for Tech Enthusiasts

Update The Rise of AI Benchmarks: What You Need to KnowOne buzzword shaping the future of artificial intelligence is SWE-Bench, a benchmark that launched in late 2024 to evaluate AI models' coding proficiency. Reflecting Silicon Valley's obsession with AI performance metrics, SWE-Bench has quickly become a critical measure for organizations like OpenAI and Google, influencing AI's competitive landscape. However, despite its growing popularity, SWE-Bench raises concerns regarding its accuracy as participants look for loopholes to exploit in the rankings. Critics are questioning what truly defines an AI model's capabilities and whether a more effective benchmark could emerge.Dissecting Spain’s Blackout and Renewable Energy’s RoleOn April 28, 2025, millions experienced a grid blackout across Spain and parts of Portugal and France, affecting daily life and raising significant questions about energy production. Just before the outage, renewable sources—particularly solar and wind—accounted for an impressive 70% of the electricity supply. While initial speculations linked renewables to the incident, officials are cautious about prematurely blaming them. The ongoing investigation aims to uncover the specific causes to ensure a more reliable energy grid in the future.Technological Lessons for Future Energy ProductionThis recent blackout not only highlights the intricacies of modern power grids but also the challenges posed by increased reliance on intermittent renewable energy sources. As nations transition to greener energy methods, understanding the interplay between energy production, distribution, and consumption becomes essential. The lessons drawn from Spain's experience may guide effective policies and technologies that enhance grid stability across the globe.

Why Josh Raffaelli Is Suing Brookfield Over Alleged Retaliation: Insights for Healthcare Professionals

Update An Investor’s Gutsy Legal Move in Silicon Valley In a significant legal clash, Josh Raffaelli, a seasoned venture capitalist with extensive ties to Elon Musk’s enterprises, is taking a staunch stance against Brookfield Asset Management, his former employer. The lawsuit underscores not only personal grievances but also sheds light on broader ethical concerns regarding financial accountability within major investment firms, particularly in light of pandemic-related challenges. The Whistleblower Allegations Raffaelli claims his dismissal was in retaliation for filing a whistleblower complaint with the SEC, specifically over how Brookfield managed pandemic-related real estate losses. These allegations extend into complex territories of fraud and bribery, suggesting a deeper underbelly of corporate governance issues. As healthcare providers adapt to evolving technological landscapes, the implications of such corporate conduct warrant scrutiny, drawing parallels to ethical oversight crucial in healthcare investments. Silicon Valley and Its Connections Raffaelli's history isn’t just a personal journey but a reflection of Silicon Valley’s intricate web of investments and influence. Brookfield's venture capital unit, which was closed earlier this year, had previously supported substantial investments in Musk-led initiatives such as SpaceX and Tesla. This connection raises questions about the integrity of financial backing, especially amid turbulent economic times affecting various sectors, including healthcare technology. For CIOs and healthcare administrators, understanding these dynamics is essential when considering partnerships and investments into emerging technologies. Moving Forward: Risks and Learning The ramifications of this lawsuit will likely extend beyond Raffaelli and Brookfield. It serves as a cautionary tale regarding the importance of transparency and ethical behavior in investment firms. For healthcare professionals, the ongoing evolution of health tech investments is fraught with similar risks; thus, ensuring due diligence and ethical practices is paramount as we leverage technology in healthcare settings. As the legal showdown unfolds, stakeholders across various industries, including healthcare, can glean insights on the need for robust ethical frameworks that not only safeguard investments but also enhance the trust in the rapidly evolving landscape of technology integration in healthcare.

FDA's Bold Move: AI for Scientific Review – What You Need to Know

Update A Revolutionary Step: FDA's AI Deployment In a groundbreaking move for the medical field, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) announced that it plans to deploy a new generative artificial intelligence model aimed at optimizing its scientific review process. This initiative marks a significant milestone for the agency as it strives to modernize the ways in which drugs and medical devices are evaluated for safety and efficacy. Cutting Down on Review Time FDA Commissioner Marty Makary stated that these AI advancements could slash the time previously taken for certain review tasks from three days to mere minutes. With the implementation planned before the end of June, the FDA anticipates a transformation in the efficiency of its review process. What are the Risks and Rewards? While this deployment of AI heralds the potential for increased efficiency, it does raise crucial questions about the accuracy and reliability of these technologies when it comes to the health and safety of millions. The FDA’s pilot testing phase has spurred discussions among scientists and stakeholders about whether AI can truly replace the nuanced decision-making performed by human experts. Impacts on Drug Development This innovative strategy isn’t just about speed; it also reflects a shift in how health technology is perceived in the regulatory environment. As the world grapples with rising drug prices and a growing demand for efficient healthcare solutions, the FDA’s AI deployment may also encourage pharmaceutical companies to invest more in AI research and practices, potentially enhancing drug development efforts across the industry. Final Thoughts As we witness the FDA taking this bold step towards integrating AI into its scientific review process, it’s important for healthcare professionals, patients, and policymakers to remain engaged. The success of this initiative could reshape not only how therapies are validated but also how quickly they can reach the public. Keeping a close eye on how this technology unfolds will be essential for ensuring that innovation aligns with the best interests of healthcare.

Add Row
Add Element
Glytain Logo
update
WorldPulse News
cropper
update

Glytain empowers healthcare professionals and businesses to navigate the evolving digital landscape, driving innovation and improving patient outcomes. 🚀

  • update
  • update
  • update
  • update
  • update
  • update
  • update
Add Element

COMPANY

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Menu 5
  • Menu 6
Add Element

+639220000000

AVAILABLE FROM 8AM - 5PM

City, State

, ,

Add Element

ABOUT US

At Glytain, we bridge the gap between healthcare and technology by delivering expert insights, cutting-edge trends, and in-depth analysis of digital health innovations. Our platform is designed for healthcare professionals, tech innovators, and forward-thinking businesses looking to stay ahead in the rapidly evolving healthcare landscape.

Add Element

© 2025 CompanyName All Rights Reserved. Address . Contact Us . Terms of Service . Privacy Policy

Terms of Service

Privacy Policy

Core Modal Title
T
Please Check Your Email
We Will Be Following Up Shortly
*
*
*